You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#26 2009-05-28 06:56:35
- Meow
- Member
- From: New Taipei, Taiwan
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 677
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
It is pity that 1.4 still remains 1.2's look. It should use 1.3's.
Offline
#27 2009-05-28 08:44:25
- FSX
- Former Developer
- From: NL
- Registered: 2008-05-09
- Posts: 818
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
It is pity that 1.4 still remains 1.2's look. It should use 1.3's.
The goal of 1.4 was to be backwards compatible. If we had changed the whole markup it would cause trouble for people who want to upgrade their 1.2 forum if it's integrated in their website. And mods for 1.2 would work anymore.
Offline
#28 2009-05-28 10:36:36
- SuperMAG
- Member
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 715
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
why not just make a new style for it that resembles 1.3.
MyFootballCafe.com is Now Online!
Offline
#29 2009-05-28 15:00:18
- hcgtv
- Member
- From: Charlotte, NC
- Registered: 2008-05-07
- Posts: 466
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
why not just make a new style for it that resembles 1.3.
Like OxygenB?
PHPCrossRef . We Love TXP . TXP Themes . TXP Tags . TXP Planet . TXP Make
Offline
#30 2009-05-28 22:27:37
- SuperMAG
- Member
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 715
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
yep, u people can make that official theme rather then the old one.
MyFootballCafe.com is Now Online!
Offline
#31 2009-05-31 03:04:05
- Meow
- Member
- From: New Taipei, Taiwan
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 677
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Otherwise, it doesn't change any part in the core of FluxBB.
Offline
#32 2009-05-31 12:39:13
- SuperMAG
- Member
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 715
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
yep thats it. i doesnt edit any core code. just changes the offical style.
MyFootballCafe.com is Now Online!
Offline
#33 2009-05-31 12:41:11
- Ememone
- Member
- From: Warsaw
- Registered: 2008-09-13
- Posts: 43
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Where is a HDIFF link to upgrade my 1.2.21 to 1.4 beta? Already seen it somewhere here and now I can not find...
Offline
#34 2009-05-31 13:46:11
- elbekko
- Former Developer
- From: Leuven, Belgium
- Registered: 2008-04-30
- Posts: 1,132
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
http://fluxbb.org/download/releases/1.4-beta/hdiff/
It's strange, I'm sure I mentioned them in my first post
Ben
SVN repository for my extensions - The thread
Quickmarks 0.5
“Question: How does a large software project get to be one year late? Answer: One day at a time!” - Fred Brooks
Offline
#35 2009-05-31 20:07:00
- kierownik
- Member
- From: Tilburg, Netherlands
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 339
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
that is from 1.2.20 to 1.4 but not from 1.2.21 to 1.4
My GitHub Profile
Offline
#36 2009-05-31 20:19:41
- Paul
- Developer
- From: Wales, UK
- Registered: 2008-04-27
- Posts: 1,653
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
I edited the first post after the site was updated, obviously incorrectly.
The only thing worse than finding a bug is knowing I created it in the first place.
Offline
#37 2009-06-06 13:36:38
- Ememone
- Member
- From: Warsaw
- Registered: 2008-09-13
- Posts: 43
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Hey, what is it?
Last edited by Ememone (2009-06-06 13:36:54)
Offline
#38 2009-06-06 15:19:46
- Smartys
- Former Developer
- Registered: 2008-04-27
- Posts: 3,139
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Sometimes line endings are changed.
Offline
#39 2009-06-06 18:02:19
- Ememone
- Member
- From: Warsaw
- Registered: 2008-09-13
- Posts: 43
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
1. Why should we change "FluxBB" to "PunBB" (like on the screen)?
2. Is there a file like "12_to_14_update.php" to update my database after changing files? Is it not necessary in this case?
Offline
#40 2009-06-06 18:42:04
- Smartys
- Former Developer
- Registered: 2008-04-27
- Posts: 3,139
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
1. Aha, right. That's what I get for posting 10 minutes after waking up
It's a comment, there's no need to change it. Whether it says PunBB or FluxBB there is irrelevant.
2. db_update.php is included and should automatically detect that you need to update your forum once you update the files.
Offline
#41 2009-06-07 02:51:24
- Moloch
- Member
- Registered: 2008-05-18
- Posts: 12
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Is there any plans for an updater for 1.3-legacy to 1.4?
Offline
#42 2009-06-07 03:41:01
- Smartys
- Former Developer
- Registered: 2008-04-27
- Posts: 3,139
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
db_update.php is meant to update properly: if not, write a bug report specifying exactly where it fails.
Offline
#43 2009-06-07 11:02:30
- Ememone
- Member
- From: Warsaw
- Registered: 2008-09-13
- Posts: 43
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Hey, after db_update.php "sucessfully updated my database", then I click link to my forum index. And after that I have this message again: "Your FluxBB database is out-of-date and must be upgraded in order to continue. Please run db_update.php in order to complete the upgrade process.". Then, I again run db_update.php and I have a message: "Your database is already as up-to-date as this script can make it."
What is wrong?
Offline
#44 2009-06-07 11:17:50
- Smartys
- Former Developer
- Registered: 2008-04-27
- Posts: 3,139
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
That's the first report I've heard of it happening and I'm afraid I don't see where in the code in include/common.php it's going wrong:
if (!isset($pun_config['o_database_revision']) || $pun_config['o_database_revision'] < FORUM_DB_REVISION || version_compare($pun_config['o_cur_version'], FORUM_VERSION, '<'))
You would have to experiment and see which of the checks is failing.
Offline
#45 2009-06-20 20:00:13
- kierownik
- Member
- From: Tilburg, Netherlands
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 339
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Is it fairly safe to use the 1.4 beta in a production site?
My GitHub Profile
Offline
#46 2009-06-21 03:31:07
- MattF
- Member
- From: South Yorkshire, England
- Registered: 2008-05-06
- Posts: 1,233
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
Is it fairly safe to use the 1.4 beta in a production site?
The answer is already in your question. Beta. Safe it most likely may be. Advisable it is not. Merely for the fact that beta status means it may have hitherto unnoticed bugs.
Screw the chavs and God save the Queen!
Offline
#47 2009-06-21 06:28:14
- kierownik
- Member
- From: Tilburg, Netherlands
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 339
Offline
#48 2009-06-21 07:27:34
- MattF
- Member
- From: South Yorkshire, England
- Registered: 2008-05-06
- Posts: 1,233
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
A SQL injection is a bug too. Anything which doesn't work as designed or as it should is construed as a bug. Again, whilst ever it is in Beta status, nothing can be guaranteed. Unlikely though it is that any bugs such as the above exist, there is that possibility. The whole point of a Beta release is to find any bugs which may exist.
Screw the chavs and God save the Queen!
Offline
#49 2009-06-21 07:58:12
- kierownik
- Member
- From: Tilburg, Netherlands
- Registered: 2008-05-10
- Posts: 339
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
V1.4 comes from 1.2 so there cannot be much wrong
But bugs may always exist but not noticed
My GitHub Profile
Offline
#50 2009-06-21 08:58:18
- MattF
- Member
- From: South Yorkshire, England
- Registered: 2008-05-06
- Posts: 1,233
- Website
Re: FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released
V1.4 comes from 1.2 so there cannot be much wrong
But bugs may always exist but not noticed
There has been quite a lot of new code added to 1.4, hence the Beta release for bug testing. 1.2* was obviously stable, whereas 1.4 is the same basic beast but with a revamp.
Screw the chavs and God save the Queen!
Offline