paul at fluxbb.org

If anybody has an up-to-date rtl language pack, Hebrew, Arabic whatever could they email me a copy.  Testing in English is a little problematic because if something appears to be transposed incorrectly its difficult to tell if its a bug or if its because the language string was created for left to right.

I've been experimenting.  I can get rtl to work just fine in IE6, IE7 and IE8.  I can't get it to work in Opera 10.5 which appears to be extremely buggy.  I may be able to get it work in Opera 10.2 which seems to behave a little better.  I think I will leave finishing the rtl styesheet until after RC2 is released and any remaining bugs have been ironed out.

Quite possibly, but not at the moment.

5

(56 replies, posted in Announcements)

Assuming standard and browser specific versions of border-radius are being used it should look rounded in Mozilla and Webkit based browsers and possibly Opera 10.5 (though I'm not sure about this) but nothing else.

6

(1 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Fixed r1517.  I would say thats a bug in the browser.

7

(30 replies, posted in FluxBB discussion)

BTW: What is Meego.  I had a quick look at the front page of the site and it didn't give any clue apart perhaps from being something to do with mobile devices.

8

(25 replies, posted in FluxBB discussion)

The downside of trying to integrate everything is that you can end up spending more time developing and maintaining the site than you do the application the site is supposed to be supporting.

9

(25 replies, posted in FluxBB discussion)

I've used Tortoisegit and it seemed to work well enough.

10

(25 replies, posted in FluxBB discussion)

Reines: If you think Git is the way to go for future development then it would be kind of short sighted to tie yourself to SVN now.  You might even find yourself in the position of using SVN for 1.4 and Git for future versions which would be a mess.  If speed is of the essence why not go for a third party service in the short term and then investigate how to bring it onto your own server at your leisure.

An alternative option is to get rid of the messaging fields but add a short generic "Other information" field rather like a signature where people can give some more information about themselves including their contact details if they wish.

12

(36 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Not some browser setting or security/cleaner app removing cookies I suppose.

13

(36 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Reines wrote:

Good point, maybe we need a wishlist for features to consider after 1.4 is released, where we can decide if they should be added to 1.4 later or postponed to 2.0.

I suspect that will depend solely on how fast the development of v2 progresses.

I think the option to hide is underkill.  Personally I think it comes into the category of pointless information and is ripe for deletion.  The info could simply be included in userlist somewhere where anybody desperate for the information could find it. But thats for future version.

15

(3 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Thats the infamous 3px jog bug.  It only applies to IE6 and is only ever going to be noticable if there is a signature and its barely noticeable then.  I already knew it was there, I just decided it wasn't worth the bother of fixing it.

If you want to know the fix, you have to apply position relative to .blockpost .postmsg and move it 3px to the left.  Then you have set left to 0 for .blockpost .postsignature and use selectors which IE6 doesn't recognise to set left on .blockpost .postmsg to 0 for all other browsers.

quaker wrote:

This is like going to a FORD dealer and saying Toyota better...
Q

Unlikely at the present time I would have thought.

I think you can make the kind of alterations you want by changing the css to suit your own requirements.  Otherwise its probably time to stop tinkering.

qie wrote:

how about it?

It depends how you define powerful.  I would define it as a system that allows me to do what I want in the shortest time with the least fuss.  On that basis SMF aint it.

In the forum world the acronym PM stands for "Private messaging" and is an oft requested feature which could explain the confusion.  I hope you don't object but I've edited the topic title.

20

(3 replies, posted in General discussion)

Yes its 300 seconds.

21

(2 replies, posted in General support (1.4))

Thats because in post.php there is only one div blockpost which wraps all the reviewed posts. Topic moved because not a bug.

22

(5 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Fixed r1432.

23

(35 replies, posted in Announcements)

I added an update to the announcement to say localization has now been added.

24

(5 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Thanks. Fixed r1412.

I will leave this topic open.  If you find any more could you post them here.

25

(5 replies, posted in Bug reports (1.4))

Fixed everything apart from the plugin.
- Required is going to be used by forms
- Submit may be used by plugins.