Forums

Unfortunately no one can be told what FluxBB is - you have to see it for yourself.

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: FluxBB discussion » FluxBB 1.4 : url rewriting ? » 2009-01-12 13:06:59

vnpenguin
yemgi wrote:

And as already replied to your first post here you are not speaking for the French community so stop saying so please.

Do you mean "french speaking community" ?

#2 Re: Announcements » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-11 07:01:30

vnpenguin

1.2/1.4 : I say NO
2.0 : I can't wait for
and:

Connor wrote:

Version 1.3
We will not be continuing to directly develop version 1.3 ...
...
We do not intend to support this release, ...

So FluxBB dev team pushes me to return to PunBB, it's sure!

The last word (maybe) to dev team: you are killing a nice OSS project. It's sad, so sad!

#3 Re: Announcements » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-10 23:14:53

vnpenguin

I'm using 1.3-r718 now. If there is no extension feature in 1.4, I would like to say NO to 1.4 and try stay with 1.3-r718.modified_by_me.

For 2.0, sorry, I can't wait for it.

#4 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-09 14:59:05

vnpenguin
Pedro wrote:

I see quite a bit of html here and there in the code. I suggest you guys move it all to templates. which kind of template engine are you planning to use? ure php syntax? Simple string replacement? A template system like smarty?

Personally, I say No, No and No to Smarty in FluxBB !

FluxBB = Simple, Fast, Speed and please KISS !

#5 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-08 13:38:25

vnpenguin
Strofanto wrote:

1.4 won't support extensions, as 1.2 doesn't either.

So why not just call 1.2.something instead of 1.4 which makes total confusion with the current 1.3 -devel branch ?

#6 Re: FluxBB discussion » List of pages » 2009-01-08 11:37:58

vnpenguin
elbekko wrote:

It's in the hidden items section in Oxygen.css, probably meant to also hide the 'Pages' text.

So, do something output to HTML page and at the same time keep them hidden with CSS style ? Sorry, I can't understand this lol

#7 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-08 11:36:19

vnpenguin
horus wrote:

I see some people already using r718 and I'd like to do the same (I know, it's a svn version with bugs but it's at my own risk), the only worry is I can't update my forum when 2.0 come out so my today choice will close the door on my future.

Why you can't do this ?

#8 FluxBB discussion » List of pages » 2009-01-07 15:12:14

vnpenguin
Replies: 9

3177185950_abe736a6a5_o.png
Logically, it should be : 1 2 3 ... 6

#9 FluxBB discussion » Question about "users" table & "activate_key" field » 2009-01-04 18:33:28

vnpenguin
Replies: 1

Hi,
In table "users", if I found the field "activate_key" is NULL, so this user was validated (by e-mail address) and his account was activated, right ?

Thanks,

#10 Re: FluxBB discussion » Au nom des francophones: Le developpement de FluxBB1.3 est trop long ! » 2009-01-02 13:14:00

vnpenguin
admincdw wrote:

...
Au nom de tous les francophones qui utilisent FluxBB1.3, nous demandons aux développeurs de FluxBB1.3 d'accélérer le rythme si possible et de pouvoir sortir la version finale cette année 2009 (chose qui est impossible si vous continuez au même rythme...)

Put**n, il me faut encore douze mois ? sad

#11 Re: General support (1.2) » nice forums » 2008-12-28 19:29:04

vnpenguin

Apache + PHP + MySQL tongue

#12 Re: FluxBB discussion » The best way to get involved is to get involved » 2008-12-28 13:28:24

vnpenguin
elbekko wrote:

As it is now, while we're waiting for 1.3 to be finished, alot of people are leaving, which could eventually lead to FluxBB's death, which would be bad.

I come to FluxBB from 1.2.x PunBB. I don't like to use fluxbb 1.2.* and I can't wait for 1.3-final (when ?), so I live with 1.3-dev r718 and I'm relatively happy with this until now.

I don't like to return again to punbb 1.3.x. But only the God know what will arrive.

Waiting, waiting and waiting for 1.3-final of fluxbb is really boring for me sad

#13 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 14:02:06

vnpenguin
MattF wrote:

1.2* - No-one is suggesting that the current devs carry on with anything other than security fixes. If you note, I myself, as well as others, have mentioned that their efforts would be best concentrated on the latest release. There are other people on here willing to take on the burden of further developing the 1.2* branch.

Yep, a smart devel team will do exactly what you said smile

#14 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 09:23:37

vnpenguin
Jarkko wrote:

I don't think you've been reading carefully what I've said.  tongue  The way I see it now, there are at least three ideas about this floating around:

  1. Have separate devs for the 1.2 (1.4) branch (as suggested at least by Smartys, Elbekko, me…)

  2. Develop both branches with the same developers (yann, …?)

  3. Stop developing 1.2 (only maintaining security fixes) and focus all efforts on the 1.3 (2.0) branch instead (Rich, ridgerunner)

You seem to be under the impression that I support C, and still want to use 1.2.

Yes, I vote for C. tongue

#15 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 07:16:44

vnpenguin
yann wrote:

Please reconsider your position - you don't have enough people to maintain two branches. Maintain 1.2 with security fixes, release a rock solid, evolutive 2.0, and then add features, regularly, making sure the upgrades are easy.

Agreed 100% !

#16 Re: FluxBB discussion » Hide some forum in "search/recent" results ? » 2008-12-27 07:12:02

vnpenguin
La`me wrote:

It is possible and I could quite easily make an extension to do this, But I don't really want to smile

No need extension anymore. Just changed some line of code and it works like a charm big_smile

#17 FluxBB discussion » Unanswered topics search » 2008-12-26 21:28:26

vnpenguin
Replies: 2

Logically, all closed topics should not be listed in this search result.

#18 Re: FluxBB discussion » Hide some forum in "search/recent" results ? » 2008-12-26 21:18:19

vnpenguin

Impossible to have necessary hooks for this kind of manipulation, I have to ... modify the code of search_functions.php tongue

#19 FluxBB discussion » Hide some forum in "search/recent" results ? » 2008-12-26 06:41:59

vnpenguin
Replies: 5

Hi,
I would like to hide all posts of some forum in "Search/recent", "search/new" results. Is there any extension for this ?

I'm using 1.3-dev r718.

Thanks

#20 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-24 13:55:29

vnpenguin
lie2815 wrote:

Correct. Maybe there should be the changes like template system etc. until 2.0 release.

But people have been waiting for a new version for a long time. So, finish the markup, release it as 1.5, and work on 2.0!! wink

1.5 or 2.0 or whatever you want, but 1.3-final should be released, of course with finished markup work in this.

I don't think we need more feature for 1.2. Just security fix is ok. You have not powerful team (at last I think) so have to focus the work to important branch (1.3 here).

#21 Re: General support (1.2) » Link problem » 2008-12-22 22:33:33

vnpenguin
/DOCUME~1/ADMINI~1/LOCALS~1/Temp/profile.php

I'm very amazed with your ... web root lol
How you configure your web server ? Where are fluxbb files ?

#22 Re: FluxBB discussion » Is FluxBB still an project in progress? » 2008-12-20 17:59:51

vnpenguin
elbekko wrote:

If you want an unfinished version of Flux, go use PunBB.

Do not throw oil on the fire ! Especially when you are Fluxbb's developer smile

#23 Re: FluxBB discussion » Is FluxBB still an project in progress? » 2008-12-20 17:00:47

vnpenguin

@chris: agreed completly with you. That's why I wrote "Fluxbb needs a new management strategy".

#24 Re: General support (1.2) » Login issues » 2008-12-20 13:45:21

vnpenguin

Try :

define('FORUM', 1);

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.4.8