You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#51 Re: Feature requests » Mark topics as read » 2009-06-10 11:03:26
- elbekko
That is exactly what's happening.
And the dot is to represent if you've posted in that topic or not. This functionality can be disabled.
#52 Re: Feature requests » Mark topics as read » 2009-06-07 11:42:14
- elbekko
Erm, the 1.4 topic tracking is exactly the same as in 1.3, and is more than adequate and already quite the improvement on 1.2's system.
#53 Re: Core development » A real site update » 2009-06-03 11:09:32
- elbekko
You're right in that it's definitely more structured.
This layout with the current colour scheme would be very nice I'd say ![]()
#54 Re: Core development » A real site update » 2009-06-03 10:28:01
- elbekko
Same, the blue on the home page especially is a bit too much.
#55 Re: Feature requests » Forum/Subforum index last column content » 2009-06-02 22:59:36
- elbekko
It is far from worth it, you need a few extra joins on potentially big tables.
#56 Re: Core development » FluxBB 1.4 » 2009-06-01 15:50:44
- elbekko
No, that's the wrong tag I accidentally created. The right one is fluxbb-1.4-beta.
(I suck at releases)
TortoiseSVN is a bitch and won't let me delete it though. But it'll get done when I have time again.
#57 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-31 13:46:11
- elbekko
http://fluxbb.org/download/releases/1.4-beta/hdiff/
It's strange, I'm sure I mentioned them in my first post ![]()
#58 Re: FluxBB discussion » Any News on Fluxbb 2.0 » 2009-05-29 12:29:13
- elbekko
No, it's purely planning for now.
#59 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-27 21:52:29
- elbekko
Erm, we've never had a report about that AFAIK. Feel free to make a bug report though ![]()
#60 Re: Core development » FluxBB 1.4 » 2009-05-27 13:41:10
- elbekko
No, everything should be done on trunk, and tags just refer to a certain revision.
#61 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-27 11:41:44
- elbekko
elbekko, you da man!
Where should the bug reports go?
Just created a few new forums for that ![]()
#62 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-26 23:03:13
- elbekko
Yann: I'll have a think over that, but as I explained I really don't have that much time on my hands.
#63 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-26 22:18:51
- elbekko
Thanks for the report, I guess those last changes weren't tested.
#64 Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-26 22:07:51
- elbekko
- Replies: 65
Again, it took longer than expected because we're all very busy, but we've managed to get a beta release steamed up ![]()
The site has been updated to take account of this release. There are no more 'changed files' archives due to a new release script where this hasn't been added. If there are many requests for these, they might come back for future releases.
EDIT: Max's bug should be fixed now.
#65 Re: General discussion » How to screw up an Open Source project » 2009-05-26 13:51:29
- elbekko
We're all incredibly busy with studying, I'm sure. So if 1.4 doesn't come out, it's because I don't have time to do all the crap that's associated with a release.
#66 Re: General support (1.2) » SQLite vs MySQL or PostgreSQL » 2009-05-23 11:58:57
- elbekko
My preference goes out to MySQL with transactions, but since that's only supported in 1.3 and 1.4, that isn't an option (yet).
But yes, I'd certainly recommend stepping away from SQLite. MySQL or PgSQL aren't really that different performance-wise, but most of FluxBB has been written with MySQL in mind, and so have most modifications.
As for converting, I've never done it myself, but I fear there may be some incompatibilities between database dumps. The easiest solution is probably installing 1.2 using MySQL, and then importing the data from SQLite using an SQL dump.
#67 Re: General support (1.2) » Password field in install.php » 2009-05-22 20:58:05
- elbekko
This has already been done in 1.3 and 1.4 ![]()
#68 Re: Core development » is_valid_email() » 2009-05-20 18:59:13
- elbekko
E-mail regex checking is bollocks anyway. It works in 99% of cases, and if people need the other case, they can change it ![]()
#69 Re: FluxBB discussion » Will there be updates from previous versions? » 2009-05-19 11:45:55
- elbekko
There should be, yes.
#70 Re: Programming » Support Desk for Fluxbb mod » 2009-05-18 18:40:59
- elbekko
lie2815 wrote:As far as I remember, it's faster to use GROUP BY t.id rather than DISTINCT...
That wouldn't work for PostgreSQL though.
And damn I hate it for that.
*wanders off mumbling*
#71 Re: General discussion » How to screw up an Open Source project » 2009-05-18 17:05:45
- elbekko
We didn't shoot it down as far as I recall, just suggested the alternative of people sending patches and if they wish they can join the team (like some already have
).
#72 Re: General discussion » Post your desktop » 2009-05-18 17:03:50
- elbekko
Nice ![]()
But judging by that spoiler on the front you haven't done any proper offroading ![]()
#73 Re: General discussion » Post your desktop » 2009-05-18 16:35:55
- elbekko
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/2450/bg20090518.png
Warning: huge.
#74 Re: Core development » Bug in confirm_current_url in 1.3 » 2009-05-18 16:18:13
- elbekko
All DB layers should implement end_transaction(), so the if isn't even needed.
Rolling back seems a bit useless, as I don't really see what would happen of any importance before the check.
#75 Re: General support (1.2) » Topic view counters are whack » 2009-05-18 16:12:59
- elbekko
It isn't something that really can be fixed without doing bot sniffing etc.
You could write a modification that only updates the counter when a member view it though.
