Forums

Unfortunately no one can be told what FluxBB is - you have to see it for yourself.

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: General support (1.2) » confused CPU usage problem .... » 2010-01-22 11:43:07

Dave
lie2815 wrote:

Uhm... doesn't a dedicated server mean that there's only one website running on it?

Not at all. A dedicated server means that you have an entire server all to yourself that isn't shared with anyone else. It may host 1 to x domains.

#2 Re: FluxBB discussion » e-mail or email » 2009-10-15 22:33:39

Dave

Add a vote for e-mail.  I think it's a better representation of what it really is, electronic mail, as has been pointed out.

#3 Re: Core development » Data type » 2009-08-11 10:30:30

Dave

With MySQL at least it doesn't matter.  MySQL is very forgiving of having numbers enclosed in single quotes though, technically, they shouldn't be.

#4 Re: Core development » Migrating search tables???? » 2009-06-29 17:47:59

Dave

IMO the tables should at least be created even if they don't contain any data.  You really can't ask people to manually create tables and certainly not to get them created correctly.

#5 Re: Programming » Database update question » 2009-06-29 11:47:36

Dave

Depends really.  There are, potentially, situations where you would want to only update things that have changed and other cases where simply updating everything might be a better choice.  I don't think you can say that either method is THE method to use.

#6 Re: General support (1.4) » Length of varchar fields » 2009-06-28 23:37:07

Dave

There's nothing to be gained by changing the length of the varchar definitions.  By design varchar columns will only consume as much space as is required.  Even if a column is defined as 255 if you only insert 10 characters that's all the space that will be consumed.

#7 Re: Programming » Function question » 2009-06-26 13:29:40

Dave

You won't notice a difference performance wise Matt.  A good "rule of thumb" is to create a function if you use the same block of code in more than one place.  For exactly the reason you stated, much easier to update it once instead of remembering all of the places it might be.

#8 Re: General support (1.2) » changing avatar problem » 2009-05-14 19:20:01

Dave

Your web server or PHP do not have a temp directory define or the web server process does not have enough permission to write to the temporary directory.

#9 Re: Feature requests » /include/parser.php: waste of CPU! » 2009-05-03 20:01:19

Dave
SuperMAG wrote:

well if people changed sittings, the old caches files gets expired. and new are created by the first visitor that vists the topic.

A cached page would be for everyone and there wouldn't be a copy of a post for each person.  What you see and what I see may be different.  How do you decide which page should be cached.  It's a chicken and egg situation.  You have to build the page to be displayed every time to accommodate user and board settings and preferences.  You can't build a single page that will satisfy everyone.

#10 Re: General discussion » paypal.com ? » 2009-04-15 15:32:01

Dave

If that's the case then a review of their policies and protection is available on the PayPal site itself.  Of course they aren't going to reveal too many details though.

#11 Re: General discussion » paypal.com ? » 2009-04-15 12:38:39

Dave

1. Yes though payments made be made without joining PayPal.
2. To verify who you are.
3. Yes.
4. Huh?

#12 Re: General support (1.2) » [Install] - specifying socket for mysql connection » 2009-02-03 13:03:56

Dave

It has nothing to do with Flash.  An installation of MySQL may specify any socket (port) and philipPF was explaining the proper syntax to use if an installation of MySQL happens to use a non-standard support (ie: the default port MySQL uses).

#13 Re: Programming » Database transactions » 2009-01-16 18:23:30

Dave

The encapsulation of a transaction should only need to be done, in this particular case, when the "do the transfer" button is pressed.  By that time you should have validated all of the data and amounts and the only thing remaining would be to actually complete the transfer.  Since the transfer itself is an atomic event if it fails for some reason it's very simple to roll back.  "Industrial strength" SQL engines allow transactions to be encapsulated, atomic, for this very reason.

#14 Re: Core development » Changes 871-873 » 2009-01-15 16:20:58

Dave

In the FWIW column I just created a virtual host that points to my local SVN repository.  Allows you to make changes and see the results instantly.

#15 Re: Core development » Your names » 2009-01-15 11:37:37

Dave

Dave Martin (my IRC name)

#16 Re: Announcements » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-14 19:59:01

Dave

We're taking care of existing bugs that have been reported for the most part.

#17 Re: General discussion » Post your desktop » 2009-01-12 15:33:19

Dave
pjalar wrote:

Very nice indeed!  Thank you!

#18 Re: General discussion » Post your desktop » 2009-01-12 13:50:54

Dave

I'd love to and I've search for one.  I've been using that same BMP file on my desktop for more than 10 years now.

#19 Re: General discussion » Post your desktop » 2009-01-12 13:18:03

Dave

I dislike a bunch of things on my desktop so mine is barren when everything is minimized.

#20 Re: Feature requests » How to best deal with feature requests? » 2009-01-09 15:39:24

Dave
KeyDog wrote:

No clean way of counting interest

Interest does not, and should not, indicate whether or not something should be considered for the base.  The number of people visiting the fora is, overall, a small percentage of the people actually using Flux.

#21 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2009-01-09 15:36:55

Dave
vnpenguin wrote:

Personally, I say No, No and No to Smarty in FluxBB !

Amen to that many many times over!

#22 Re: Programming » Outputting two messages from one script » 2009-01-08 15:10:21

Dave

Using flush is never guaranteed to actually send anything to a browser.  It's dependent on the IP path between the server and the browser, the size of the packets and buffering that's done of packets as they make the journey from the server to the browser.  As you discovered, it doesn't work as you might expect a majority of the time (and if it does happen to work once it probably won't work the next time).

#23 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 20:32:41

Dave
hcgtv wrote:

There are templating systems that are rather nice, Textpattern's tag system is my favorite. Even the way Wordpress does it, with PHP tags mixed in with HTML, not my favorite, would be better than what exists now.

Both of your examples are perfect examples of having to learn "yet another language" and why it can cause more confusion than it's worth.  In the reference you linked to there are 139 tags and using it would be anything but simple.  You'd be better off learning some XHTML and styling which are both skills that may be used for other things.

#24 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 20:29:57

Dave
elbekko wrote:

But it certainly wouldn't be another language to learn or anything, just more separation of markup and code, and making it easy for extensions to change the markup (because, face it, sometimes an extension just needs to add something somewhere).

But doing that really does require something to allow the separation to take place.  This really is a case of you can't have your cake and eat it too.

#25 Re: FluxBB discussion » The future of FluxBB » 2008-12-27 18:39:32

Dave
Connor wrote:
Why not release 1.3 ASAP then add a template system etc to 2.0

The problem with this is, although the extension system means upgrading from 1.3.1 to 1.3.2 would be easy, upgrading from 1.3 to 2.0 will not be as simple. With a template system, all the extensions for 1.3 will need rewritten, and the markup will probably be different enough to break many styles. We want the next major release to be complete enough to have a number of years of life before it needs replacing otherwise we're effectively destroying all the work done by the community for 1.3

I'm probably in the minority on this one but IMO a template system over complicates things and forces one to learn yet another "language" of some sort.  I've yet to see/use a so called template solution that actually makes things easier for people.  I understand what the goal of a template system is but it is much easier to talk about than it is to actually implement in a way that is helpful and easy to use.  Given the goal of simplicity and speed that FluxBB has, developing a template system for it seems contradictory to the overall goal.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.4.8