Forums

Unfortunately no one can be told what FluxBB is - you have to see it for yourself.

You are not logged in.

#1 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 22:43:58

SuperMAG

ok thats good. lool that what i was saying. keep up the good work, see u in 2 months lol.

#2 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 20:49:51

SuperMAG

What ever, just say you guys dont have whatever (time, desire whatever) and you cant work on fluxbb anymore if you dont want to. i just addressed my personal ideas which at least some one posting it, brought a little life to the topic, and the rest is up to u guys.

MattF wrote:
SuperMAG wrote:

mmm, you guys still trying to answer me instead of answering to the solution.

What solution? Your personal opinion and ideas are exactly that.

Btw, is talking utter crap an intentional choice or just a natural talent?

HELOOOOO, not the best person to understand that, may be in few months.

#3 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 17:34:17

SuperMAG

mmm, you guys still trying to answer me instead of answering to the solution.

When did exatly i said screw 1.4.

I gave an example, "people will say who cares when there one few people read the wiki of an almost dead project".

1.3 had potential, 1.4 has no potential, 2.0 will have alooot of potential. people will start comparing it to big fishes once its done.

And i never said leave 1.4 in where it is, i though it was little update but it isnt if u look at how much time did that update take.

How many months u guys are working on 1.4. its still not finished, that confuses me, do you guys have any desire to finish 1.4.

It doesn't stop people from planing for next versions.

Once you guys put a plan for 2.0, people will accelerate on finishing 1.4 to start hunting the big fish.

#4 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 15:16:48

SuperMAG

lol, you are trying to answer my questions instead of looking in the other way.

If someone doesnt write guides for now, its ok, most of the people say, who cares, there are just few people, they will answer them myself in forums instead, they just cant write a whole guide for few people. to me this 1.4 is not getting any popular.

i will say it again, its just a small thing, the code is way more important. people will contribute more in a project they are interested in it. which proves why is only few people intrested in 1.4.

i said about 1.4 is old, because it is. some behind the coding scenes updates doesn't make it more interesting, if the difference is like the extension system, everybody will call that huge thing, and alot of people will rejoin or join the project again.

#5 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 13:33:33

SuperMAG

Lol first of all, that was a joke, including that smarty leaving thing lol. i just though cuz few months ago i got bored and stop coming here and stoped clicking on New Posts Link at top, yet he still didnt. That somehow triggered my mind lol.

As i said, i am still not very very good in english, i didnt know other word to describe people like that other then dum.
About that, I think instead of searching in wiki, people usually post a help post in the forums, and lets keep it that way, if people need help,  there is forums for it, unless its a big coding thing, you guys can make few pages for that in about two hrs. but write tutorial on how to move a post or delete a post is just (to most peope) waste of time.

when u install a software, you explore everything in it first. and when you need a thing, you search more. i am not sure someone will be searching in a wiki instead of his forums.

but as i said its not a big issue, we can deal with that when there is a code of 2.0. Like most people around here, i am not intrested in all old forums scripts like 1.2/1.4 or 1.3. i am only intrested in 2.0.

On the other thing, thats why i mentioned OR word between the first and second paragraph.

Make a topic right in this forums, discussing opening steps for 2.0 version. What didnt worked in 1.3 and what needs to be completely rewriten. as i remember, it was extension system, and seperate template system. dont remember other stuff. (With all Developers).

#6 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 12:52:16

SuperMAG

well i am still not master of english, so i didnt know what word to use.

but any one who want to have developer name beside his username SHOULD have desire to contribute in this project.

Means if he does do work this week, he should do in other unless he has serious problems. or very very busy.

its not like forcing people to work in it, its more like contributing.

and how much developers are here anyway, 5-10, those are more then enough if each of them write 10 lines of codes in a day.

---------------

EDIT: ops lol, i didnt readed ur post carefully. anyway, i am not a coder, but i can help to make this project going, or give ideas on what ever i know.

#7 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 12:47:30

SuperMAG

Do you really think so? More than a month ago, I asked for help with creating the new user guide. Since then, not a single thing has been done there, which led us to start doing this ourselves on the new server.

Lol, there are many reasons it not one contributed, like some of them don't know how to use wiki, some of them dont know how to explain in tutorials and some of them will think its just waste of time. There is just lack of desire on doing very rarely useful thing.

I am sure people will contribute more in a big project instead of writing guides for few dum people lol. and besides these things are done after the code is fully written. and the community is settled. you guys should do step at a time.

-----------

For Example First move. Lets gather all the developers in a next weekend, or when every one is free. Send emails, sms or what ever to make them to come to that meeting.

OR

Make a topic right in this forums, discussing opening steps for 2.0 version. What didnt worked in 1.3 and what needs to be completely rewriten. as i remember, it was extension system, and seperate template system. dont remember other stuff. (With all Developers).

You guys will also get help from other users who still are obsessed with flux,pun lol, like that smartass and mfffffff or matttfff, ops sorry, i mean smarty lol. i am sure he is still following every topic cuz, the only reason to me he retired from this project was to not write codes.

btw, how about plugin system like wordpress, instead of xml, u guys use php. i am not much of a coder, but alot of people perfer that.

#8 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-20 11:15:48

SuperMAG

Well i dont know what happened behind the scenes, but i am sure u can convince someone by showing him facts on what is a better system. it all needed a little showing of skills etc for them to agree with what u guys want.

well nothing can be done now, since all stuff already happened, its my foult i brought old thing.

---------

FSX, i though that flux 1.4 was just a small updates. i never though u guys would make all these stuff for it. there is still punres.org . It would take alot of time to dublicate old mods or create new one. let alone styles. and besides there are alot of people using 1.3 instead of 1.4 for that modding reason.

Why not just began with 2.0 already. You guys can do the planning and thinking thing, which will put a plan.
and then any one who has time, can contribute with that plan as much as he can.
Or it will never happen.

#9 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-19 20:09:48

SuperMAG

why, i mean if u guys just discussed this with them in long discussion, i am sure they would have agreed with what u guys wanted.

There are only few people there who write extensions or develop core. its the same here. the more people involved in a project, the more sucsessful it is. look at wordpress.

if some of them are making mistakes in coding etc, you guys can just guide them in the right way. no one make mistakes for fun.

----

btw, did u guys even started on 2.0.

#10 Re: Modifications (1.4) » Most wanted modifications? » 2009-12-19 13:01:58

SuperMAG

mmm its about what people really need.
well i use these:

1- BBcodes buttons
2- Small bookmarking plugin
3- Small Captcha plugin
4- Open Id.
5- Poll
6- Videos Embed plugin
7- Sitemap Generator Plugin
8- Brodcast Email.

------------Those were the plugins that i have-----------------
------------Those are that i dont have-----------------

9- Facebook Connect.
10- Adsense Manager.

#11 Re: General discussion » Forking out 1.3 branch? » 2009-12-19 12:23:12

SuperMAG

ok, i can say now, that forking the pun to flux only destroyed both projects. nothing else.

it has been almost a year or more (not remember), and i visit both sites in around 3-4 months, and only see that nothing happened.

all informer did was change the domain, and nothing else. if you both groups were still there working together, there would already be 2.0 with bunch of plugins and styles with support.

#13 Re: Modifications (1.2) » AJAX GOOGLE TRANSLATOR POST ! 1.0 » 2009-08-30 21:25:05

SuperMAG

not working with GC.

But incredible mod and idea. kudos to u.

#14 Re: General discussion » A childish moment. :D » 2009-08-20 11:49:46

SuperMAG
MattF wrote:
Smartys wrote:

Huh?

They seem to spend almost as much time monitoring these forums as they do their own, these days. smile

I guess that makes you smarter then smartys. big_smile hahaha

any way, its been a long time since i visited flux, not sure why i replied to this topic, but i hope devs already started on 2.0 project.

#15 Re: General discussion » Michael Jackon » 2009-07-07 05:31:27

SuperMAG
hcgtv wrote:

Put up a thumbnail gallery of the king of pop from 1968 to 2009.

Michael Jackson Through The Years

OMG Thats scary, I dont know this guy that much but i see his posts in every single forums, including mine, done by people.

what happened to his face?

#18 Re: Feature requests » Search Engine friendly URL's » 2009-06-01 14:21:50

SuperMAG

mmm, shoudnt fluxbb use the legacy 1.3 rather then old 1.3 version.

#19 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-31 12:39:13

SuperMAG

yep thats it. i doesnt edit any core code. just changes the offical style.

#20 Re: Announcements » International support » 2009-05-29 16:31:40

SuperMAG
Zhra wrote:

Thanks' so much
I'm looking forward to get Arabic translation, or at least to get the writing direction to be RTL

mauqihak ma feha montada.

#22 FluxBB discussion » Any News on Fluxbb 2.0 » 2009-05-29 11:06:43

SuperMAG
Replies: 2

Just wondering if you people started working on 2.0, not that i am impatient, but i wondered if there is a hidden trac of it. (Just curious thats all)

#23 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-28 22:27:37

SuperMAG

yep, u people can make that official theme rather then the old one.

#24 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-28 10:36:36

SuperMAG

why not just make a new style for it that resembles 1.3.

#25 Re: Announcements » FluxBB 1.4-beta1 released » 2009-05-27 16:55:15

SuperMAG
qubertman wrote:
yann wrote:

where is the long & exciting posts with all the changes from the 1.2 branch? smile

- Improve unread topic tracking
- Split/merge posts
- UTF-8 support
- DST support
- IPv6 support
- SSL support for SMTP
- Report flood protection
- Date/time formatting option for users
- Group permission for viewing userlist/profiles
- Allow a default email setting for new registrations
- Allow for multiple moderator groups
- More per-group controls
- Allow to disable the "views" column via the admin panel
- Log the ban creator for bans
- Parse BBcodes in search results
- Add first_post_id to the topics table
- Number formatting for thousands separator
- Exclude unverified users in user count and userlist
- Move hardcoded strings to language file
- A set of MySQL/MySQLi dblayers that use InnoDB and take advantage of transactions
- General changes to the dblayer
- db_update.php and database revision

Nice!!!!!!!!!

I have three questions i want to ask.

1- So what is the main difference between Flux 1.3 and Flux 1.4 Except for extension system and SEF urls.
2- And of all these changes that were maded, are you devs are sure that all the 1.2 plugins, mods and styles will still work in 1.4.
3- And Will there ever gonno be a fluxbb mods and styles download place.

Thanks for you hard work guys, even though i dont like editing the files my self but this looks like classic release.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB 1.4.8