You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#626 Re: Core development » Parser » 2008-05-04 00:54:26
- Connor
just posting this to remind myself to look into a better error message for this situation
[url=http://google.com][b][u][color=#ff0000]Google[/color][/u][[/b][/ur]#627 Core development » Parser » 2008-05-03 15:49:28
- Connor
- Replies: 12
I've started commiting changes to the parser, there may be bugs, just to warn everyone.
#628 Re: FluxBB discussion » IRC » 2008-05-03 14:27:08
- Connor
I've registered #fluxbb on freenode for now
#629 Re: FluxBB discussion » Converting my stuff » 2008-05-03 11:35:00
- Connor
Well, a couple of things, you might want to wait a couple of days since I'm definitely gonna do some big changes to the parser, although I doubt there'll be any db changes, also, please don't make anything public until we've had chance to make the announcement ourself.
#630 Re: FluxBB discussion » IRC » 2008-05-02 17:45:41
- Connor
We'll almost certainly have a channel somewhere, I dunno if its going to be "official" and promoted though
#631 Re: Core development » while (list(... » 2008-05-01 20:15:48
- Connor
I don't like it ![]()
#632 Core development » Sig info » 2008-05-01 10:06:23
- Connor
- Replies: 1
in profile.php:2031
$forum_page['sig_info'][] = '<li>'.$lang_profile['Signature info'].'</li>';but it never gets output
#633 Core development » while (list(... » 2008-05-01 10:05:16
- Connor
- Replies: 3
Is there a reason we do this instead of foreach?
#634 Re: Core development » search_idx.php » 2008-05-01 09:20:44
- Connor
Done
#635 Re: Core development » search_idx.php » 2008-04-30 23:00:34
- Connor
I did half of this, I'll get the other half done at some point if no one else bothers ![]()
#636 Re: Core development » Improved array_insert + associative keys » 2008-04-30 22:10:46
- Connor
Doesn't seem to be working
look at the Trac link on this site
#637 Re: Announcements » Welcome to FluxBB » 2008-04-30 21:48:39
- Connor
Development by us, yes, there are employees of the new owner working on PunBB though, we don't know what they will do.
#638 Re: FluxBB discussion » FluxBB vs PunBB 1.3: differences? » 2008-04-30 21:47:25
- Connor
Flux is going to go from the same version as Pun, so we will release a FluxBB 1.2.18 in order to support PunBB users who don't want to upgrade to 1.3 and the next version of Flux will be 1.3.
Fulltext search was moved to an extension, lots of other things will be slightly different I would think, the main difference is Flux isn't controlled by someone who in the end wants to make a profit from it.
#639 Re: Announcements » Welcome to FluxBB » 2008-04-30 21:44:53
- Connor
Was this based on the latest development? (the domain switch)
Sort of, I think the main reason is the shift of power, Rickard has stepped down at least for now, and the new owners of PunBB have started exerting their control (yes the domain change was one of these things), and we felt we wanted to be in control of the project we are working on.
#640 Re: Announcements » SVN and Trac » 2008-04-30 21:43:12
- Connor
I personally haven't looked at either, SVN works well for us I think, but I'm interested in having a look at them when I get chance ![]()
#641 Re: FluxBB discussion » FluxBB vs PunBB 1.3: differences? » 2008-04-30 21:40:20
- Connor
This is currently hard to say, as 1.3 is close to release they will both be similar, and we don't know what the plans are for PunBB anymore.
#642 Re: FluxBB discussion » PunBB & FluxBB: compatibility, import, and so on » 2008-04-30 21:37:31
- Connor
PunBB 1.2 will upgrade directly to FluxBB 1.3, I'm sure we'll release a script to migrate from PunBB 1.3 if its required
Extensions for Pun won't work directly on Flux, but will be similar (mainly $pun_db etc has been renamed $forum_db etc)
#643 Announcements » SVN and Trac » 2008-04-30 21:26:47
- Connor
- Replies: 7
Just to let people know, stuff is happening, SVN is up at http://fluxbb.org/svn/ as well as trac http://fluxbb.org/trac/timeline
#644 Re: Core development » Fulltext » 2008-04-30 18:47:57
- Connor
sure, btw, don't feel like this is my extension or anything, feel free to edit it
#645 Re: Core development » Hook ID Prefix Standard » 2008-04-30 17:41:41
- Connor
Added /include/search_functions.php
#646 Re: Core development » search_idx.php » 2008-04-30 15:07:50
- Connor
Is it worth using the query builder, extensions can replace the functions, its much more likely they'll want to completely replace them I would have thought and if not, they can duplicate them, edit them and replace them?
#647 Core development » Fulltext » 2008-04-30 14:15:51
- Connor
- Replies: 3
http://fluxbb.org/trac/browser/extensio … xml?rev=33
Just to keep track of what I need to do, still need to add relevance to the options list, change the search instructions and check the min word length.
#648 Re: Core development » Errors during install » 2008-04-30 11:16:01
- Connor
good point ![]()
#649 Core development » Errors during install » 2008-04-30 09:43:59
- Connor
- Replies: 2
I think as well as $notices we need to have $errors in case an extension install cannot complete (i.e. fulltext search attempted install on sqlite) and if there is anything in $errors we cancel the install and display the messages
#650 Re: Core development » Improved array_insert + associative keys » 2008-04-30 00:43:46
- Connor
Connor wrote:Hmm, we might also want to be able to insert after a certain key rather than an offset, I think that might make more sense for associative arrays.
Smartys wrote:This is useful for doing something like this:
http://punbb.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p … 80#p113780
where we could have associative keys and still manage to insert elements (using array_search('key', array_keys($array)) to find the offset). I think we need to think about using this, since it makes the arrays MUCH more usable.We can make the function generate the correct offset using that code (just check whether we're dealing with an integer or a key as the offset). So, a function call could be
array_insert($forum_head, 0, '<meta>');
or
array_insert($forum_head, 'some_meta_tag_key', '<meta>');
What happened to doing that?
